Page 52 - Työpoliittinen aikakauskirja 1 2018
P. 52

Artikkeleita Työpoliittinen aikakauskirja 1/2018
  Frey, C.B. ja Osborne, M. (2013). The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are jobs to computerisation? University of Oxford, Oxford Martin School. https:// academic/The_Future_of_Employment. pdf.
Graetz, G. ja Michaels, G. (2015). Robots at Work. CEP Discussion Paper No 1335. March 2015. download/dp1335.pdf.
Heerink, M. (2011). Exploring the in uence of age, gender, education
and computer experience on robot acceptance by older adults. In The sixth ACM/IEEE international conference on human–robot interaction. Lausanne.
Hofmann, B. (2013). Ethical Challenges with Welfare Technology: A Review of the Literature. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2): 389–406.
The Impact of Robots on Productivity, Employment and Jobs. A positioning paper by the International of Robotics. April 2017. ce/ IFR_The_Impact_of_Robots_on_ Employment.pdf.
Imamura, Y., Tanaka, T. ja Takizawa, K. (2017). Field testing of the in uence of assistive wear on the physical  tness of nursing-care workers. Kheddar, Yoshida, Sam Ge, Suzuki, Cabibihan & Eyssel (Toim.). Social Robotics. 9th International Conference, ICSR 2017 Tsukuba Japan, Proceedings.
Laanala, R. (2017). City of Helsinki Service Centre unitizes video visit. http:// www. nlandhealth. /-/city-of-helsinki-s- service-centre-utilizes-videovisit-virtual- care-up-to-85-more-cost-e cient-than- physical-home-care. Accessed April 2017.
Louie, W-Y. G., McColl, D. ja Nejat, G. (2014). Acceptance and attitudes toward a human-like socially assistive robot by older adults. Assistive Technology 26:140–150. DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2013.869703.
Matthews, J. T. (2006). Existing and Emerging Healthcare Devices for Elders to Use at Home. Technology Innovations and Aging 30 (2): 13–19.
Miskelly, F. G. (2001). Assistive technology in elderly care. Age and Ageing 20: 455–458.
             Monitz, A.B. ja Krings, B-J. (2016). Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry. Societies 6 (23).
Pajarinen, M. ja Rouvinen, P. (2014). Computerization Threatens One Third of Finnish Employment. ETLA Brief No 22. https://www.etla. /wp-content/uploads/ ETLA-Muistio-Brief-22.pdf.
Prochaska, J. O, Velicer, W. E., Rossi, J. S., Goldstein, M. G,. Marcus, B, H, RaJiowski, W., Eiore, C, Harlow, L. L., Redding,
C. A, Rosenbloom, D. ja Rossi, S. R. (1994). Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychology 13: 39–46.
Robotics in Care Services: A Finnish Roadmap. ROSE Consortium (2017). http://roseproject.aalto. /images/ publications/Roadmap- nal02062017.pdf
Saner, M. ja Wallach, W. (2015). Technology Unemployment, AI, and Workplace Standardization: The Convergence Argument. Journal of Evolution & Technology 25 (1): 74–80.
Sparrow, R. (2016). Robots in aged care: a dystopian future? AI & Society 31: 445–454.
Tuisku, O., Pekkarinen, S., Hennala, L. ja Melkas H. (2017). Robotit innovaationa hyvinvointipalveluissa. Lappeenrannan teknillinen yliopisto.
Turja, T., Van Aerschot, L., Särkikoski, T.
ja Oksanen, A. (forthcoming). Finnish healthcare professionals’ attitudes toward robots: Re ections on a population sample. Nursing Open.
Van Aerschot, L., Turja, T. ja Särkikoski (2017). Roboteista tehokkuutta ja helpotusta hoitotyöhön? Työntekijät empivät, mutta teknologia ei pelota. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 82 (6), 630–640.
Veirto A. (2017). Palvelualojen ammattiliitto PAM -jäsenkysely. Henkilökohtainen tiedonanto 30.1.2018.
van Wynsberghe, A. (2013) Designing robots for care: Care centered value- sensitive design, Science and Engineering Ethics 19:407–433. DOI: 10.1007/s11948- 011-9343-6.
Wood, L. (2016). Service robots: The next big productivity platform. PwC. http:// service-robots-the-next-big-productivity- platform/

   50   51   52   53   54