Page 35 - Työpoliittinen aikakauskirja 2 2018

Työpoliittinen aikakauskirja 2/2018 Artikkeleita
Heckman, J. ja Vytlacil, E. (2007)
Econometric Evaluation of Social Programs, Part I: Causal Models, Structural Models and Econometric Policy Evaluation. teoksessa Heckman, J. ja Leamer, E. (Eds.): Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 6B, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 4780-4874.
Hämäläinen, K. ja Tuomala, J. (2006)
Työvoimapoliittisten toimenpiteiden vaikutusten arviointi. Työpoliittinen tutkimus 315, työministeriö.
Hämäläinen, K., Uusitalo, R. ja Vuori,
J. (2008) Varying biases in matching estimates: Evidence from two randomised job search training experiments. Labour Economics, vol. 15, issue 4, 604–618.
Lechner, M. (2002) Program heterogeneity and propensity score matching: an application to the evaluation of active labor market policies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 205–220.
Lechner, M. ja Wunsch, C. (2013)
Sensitivity of Matching-based Program Evaluations to the Availability of Control Variables. Labour Economics, 21, 111–121.
Lalive, R., van Ours, J. ja Zweimüller, J. (2008) The impact of active labour market programmes on the duration of unemployment in Switzerland. The Economic Journal, 118.
Rosenbaum, P. ja Rubin, D. (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
Rosenbaum, P. ja Rubin, D. (1985)
Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling method that incorporate the propensity score. The American Statistician, 39, 33-38.
Rosholm M. ja Svarer, M. (2007) The threat effect of active labour market programmes. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110(2): 385–401.
Rubin, D. (2001) Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation. Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, 2, 169–188.
Sianesi, B. (2007) Differential effects of active labour market programs for the unemployed. Labour Economics, 15, 370–399.
StataCorp. (2013) Stata: Release 13. Statistical Software. College Station. TX: StataCorp LP.
Aho, S., Tuomala, J., Hämäläinen, K. ja Mäkiaho A. (2018) Työvoimapalvelujen kohdistaminen ja niihin osallistuvien työllistyminen. Valtioneuvoston
kanslia, Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja 19/2018.
Aho, S. ja Tuomala, J (2018)
Työvoimapalvelujen kohdentuminen
ja osallistujien työllistyminen palvelun jälkeen. Talous & Yhteiskunta, nro. 1/2018, Palkansaajien tutkimuslaitos.
Andersson, F., Holzer, M., Lane, J., Rosenblum. D. ja Smith, J. (2016) Does federally-funded job training work? Non- experimental estimates of WIA training impacts using longitudinal data on workers and firms. CESifo Working Paper no. 6071.
Biewen, M., Fitzenberger, B., Osikominu, A. ja Paul, M. (2014) The Effectiveness of Public Sponsored Training Revisited: The Importance of Data and Methodological Choices. Journal of Labor Economics, 32, 837-897.
Bloom, D. ja Michalopoulos, C. (2001)
How welfare and work policies affect employment and income: a synthesis of research. MDRC, New York.
Caliendo, M. ja Kopeinig, S. (2005) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA Discussion Paper, no. 1588.
Caliendo, M., Mahlstedt, R. ja Mitnik, O. (2017) Unobservable, but Unimportant? The Relevance of Usually Unobserved Variables for the Evaluation of Labor Market Policies. Labour Economics, 46, 14-25.
Card, D., Kluve, J. ja Weber, A. (2015)
What works? a Meta analysis of recent active labor market program evaluations. NBER Working Paper, no. 21431.
Cave, G., Bos, H., Doolittle, F. ja Toussaint C. (1993) JOBSTART: final report on a program for school dropouts. MDRC, New York.
Crépon, B., Duflo, E., Gurgand, M., Rathelot, R. ja Zamora, P. (2013) Do labor market policies have displacement effects? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 128(2), 531–580.
Crépon, B. ja van den Berg, G. (2016)
Active labor market policies. Annual Review of Economics, Vol. 8, pp. 521–546.
35